🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.